It appears as though for the moment, Parallels is taking better advantage of hardware acceleration where available. Parallels also seemed to shine on a number of other speed tests such as with file and network I/O. Parallels greatest gains seem to come from its improved graphics, gaming, and 3D performance. Overall, Parallels Desktop 5 runs 30% faster with Windows XP, and 43% faster with Windows 7, than VMware Fusion 3.0.1.' 'When we look at the major subgroups of our comprehensive test suite, Parallels is the clear winner running each group of tests 5-127% faster than VMware's solution. However with this latest round of deep testing from MacTech, they found that Parallels Desktop was the clear winner of these benchmark tests - running an average of nearly 30% faster than its competitor over the course of the entire test suite. Having tried both virtualization programs, I can say that both are excellent products. You should use feature and support information in conjunction with the below benchmarking results to make your product choice.'

The article's purpose is to assess performance (including issues we found if something didn't work right), and not product features, user interface, etc. Instead, MacTech says, 'To be clear, this article is not a product review it's a benchmarking analysis (although we were morally obligated to comment on some of the 3D graphics and games ).

It also looked at both 32- and 64-bit performance of Microsoft Windows XP and Windows 7 as virtual guest operating systems.īut don't get this 'test' confused with a product review of either virtualization platform. VMware Fusion, MacTech said it performed more than 3500 tests on both single- and multi-processor desktop and mobile Mac models. In the article, Head-to-Head: Parallels Desktop for Mac vs.

In the latest round of performance testing, MacTech takes a look at Parallels Desktop for Mac and VMware Fusion.

Parallels vs vmware gaming